Grodetsky v. Grodetsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grodetsky v. Grodetsky

38 A.D.2d 523, 327 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 523 (Grodetsky v. Grodetsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grodetsky v. Grodetsky, 38 A.D.2d 523, 327 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 25, 1971, granting motion by defendant husband to examine plaintiff wife, conditionally, within the reasonable discretion of the examining physician, as to her gynecological and psychiatric debilities, in an action by her for separation, alleging cruelty, and specifying defendant’s conduct as the cause of her physical and psychiatric illnesses, preventing her from working and further basing her claim for temporary alimony on similar allegations, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the singular facts and circumstances of this submission, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 25, 1971, granting motion by defendant husband to examine plaintiff wife, conditionally, within the reasonable discretion of the examining physician, as to her gynecological and psychiatric debilities, in an action by her for separation, alleging cruelty, and specifying defendant’s conduct as the cause of her physical and psychiatric illnesses, preventing her from working and further basing her claim for temporary alimony on similar allegations, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the singular facts and circumstances of this submission, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 523, 327 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grodetsky-v-grodetsky-nyappdiv-1971.