Grochowski v. Palm Beach County Ass'n for Retarded Children

185 So. 2d 161, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3620
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 13, 1966·No. No. 34917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grochowski v. Palm Beach County Ass'n for Retarded Children, 185 So. 2d 161, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3620 (Fla. 1966).

185 So. 2d 161 (Grochowski v. Palm Beach County Ass'n for Retarded Children) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirk v. Publix Super Markets
185 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)