Groce v. O'Malley
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gavin G., File No. 24-cv-947 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 4, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 8] is DENIED; and 3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED; and 4. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Groce v. O'Malley (Groce v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.