Grobow v. Thiele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grobow v. Thiele

217 A.D.2d 582, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7688

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 582 (Grobow v. Thiele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grobow v. Thiele, 217 A.D.2d 582, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by Fred Thiele, Marietta Seaman, Robert Hunter, James Need-ham, Douglas Penny, Arthur Siegmann, William Masterson, and the Town of Southampton Department of Building and Zoning from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated January 21, 1994.

[583]*583Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Underwood at the Supreme Court. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by Fred Thiele, Marietta Seaman, Robert Hunter, James Need-ham, Douglas Penny, Arthur Siegmann, William Masterson, and the Town of Southampton Department of Building and Zoning from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated January 21, 1994.

[583]*583Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Underwood at the Supreme Court. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 582, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grobow-v-thiele-nyappdiv-1995.