Grizaffi v. Shupack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grizaffi v. Shupack

519 So. 2d 46, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 1988 WL 1055

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 13, 1988

DocketNo. 4-86-2004

StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 46 (Grizaffi v. Shupack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grizaffi v. Shupack, 519 So. 2d 46, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 1988 WL 1055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and rulings of the trial court challenged on appeal except for the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest on the amount of $110,000.00 awarded as compensatory damages by the jury. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions that prejudgment interest be assessed in favor of appellants.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and rulings of the trial court challenged on appeal except for the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest on the amount of $110,000.00 awarded as compensatory damages by the jury. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions that prejudgment interest be assessed in favor of appellants.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 So. 2d 46, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 203, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 1988 WL 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grizaffi-v-shupack-fladistctapp-1988.