Grix, D. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANIEL AND CATHLEEN GRIX, : No. 76 MAL 2020 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : NAOMI GRIX, DECEASED, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE : COMPANY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

.(1) Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the Decedent was not a resident of her parents’ household at the time of her death even though she was listed as a “household driver” on the household insurance policy, a premium was charged, and the facts overwhelmingly establish she was also a “resident” of the household at the time of her death?

(2) Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the Decedent was not a “designated insured” entitled to stacking even though the Decedent was listed on her parents’ policy as a “driver and household resident” and premiums were charged up through and until the time of her tragic death?