Grivas v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Grivas v. City of New York

68 N.E.2d 47, 295 N.Y. 955, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1100

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 6, 1946·Published

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented the following questions of fact for the jury: whether the defendant was negligent in failing (a) to keep the viaduct sanded, (b) to post a sign warning drivers that the road was slippery when wet, and (c) to provide an adequate barrier. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, and Dye, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented the following questions of fact for the jury: whether the defendant was negligent in failing (a) to keep the viaduct sanded, (b) to post a sign warning drivers that the road was slippery when wet, and (c) to provide an adequate barrier. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, and Dye, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Grivas v. City of New York, 68 N.E.2d 47, 295 N.Y. 955, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1100 (N.Y. 1946).

Pincite

68 N.E.2d 47 (Grivas v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.