Grivas v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Grivas v. City of New York

68 N.E.2d 47, 295 N.Y. 955, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1100

DecidedJune 6, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 68 N.E.2d 47 (Grivas v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grivas v. City of New York, 68 N.E.2d 47, 295 N.Y. 955, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1100 (N.Y. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented the following questions of fact for the jury: whether the defendant was negligent in failing (a) to keep the viaduct sanded, (b) to post a sign warning drivers that the road was slippery when wet, and (c) to provide an adequate barrier. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, and Dye, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented the following questions of fact for the jury: whether the defendant was negligent in failing (a) to keep the viaduct sanded, (b) to post a sign warning drivers that the road was slippery when wet, and (c) to provide an adequate barrier. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, and Dye, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 N.E.2d 47, 295 N.Y. 955, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grivas-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1946.