Gritter v. Insurance Co. of North America

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gritter v. Insurance Co. of North America

499 So. 2d 875, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2592, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11301

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1986·No. No. 4-86-0335·Published

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the insurer following cross mo[876] tions for summary judgment and do so on the authority of Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Fike, 304 So.2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), and Hines v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co., 408 So.2d 772, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Accordingly, we hold that Bruce Gritter is a named insured under the policy of insurance and is entitled to uninsured motorist coverage without regard to the particular vehicle involved in the accident that resulted in his injuries.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of the insurer following cross mo[876] tions for summary judgment and do so on the authority of Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Fike, 304 So.2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), and Hines v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co., 408 So.2d 772, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Accordingly, we hold that Bruce Gritter is a named insured under the policy of insurance and is entitled to uninsured motorist coverage without regard to the particular vehicle involved in the accident that resulted in his injuries.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Gritter v. Insurance Co. of North America, 499 So. 2d 875, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2592, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

499 So. 2d 875 (Gritter v. Insurance Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related