Griswold v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

163 N.C. 173
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 24, 1913·Published

Opinion

Allen, J.

Tbe appeal presents tbe single inquiry as to tbe correctness of tbe rule tbat wben tbe telegram is received by tbe agent of tbe telegraph company, altb'ougb outside of reasonable office hours, it is bis duty to make reasonable efforts to deliver it, or if be cannot do so, be must endeavor to send a message to tbe sender, notifying him of nondelivery, and is controlled by Carter v. Telegraph Co., 141 N. C., 374; Suttle v. Telegraph Co., 148 N. C., 480; Carswell v. Telegraph Co., 154 N. C., 112, which have been affirmed at this term in Ellison v. Telegraph Co., ante, 5.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griswold v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 163 N.C. 173 (N.C. 1913).

163 N.C. 173 (Griswold v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suttle v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
62 S.E. 593 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Carter v. . Telegraph Co.
54 S.E. 274 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)