Griswold v. Plumb
13 Mass. 298
Opinion
The Court said, there was nothing in the objection. If Sherrill had been present, there would have been no occasion to make a demand on both the defendants, their undertaking being joint.-
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Griswold v. Plumb, 13 Mass. 298 (Mass. 1816).
13 Mass. 298 (Griswold v. Plumb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Vailes
275 N.E.2d 893 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Morse v. Aldrich
42 Mass. 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)
Mowry v. Todd
12 Mass. 281 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)