Griswold v. Plumb

13 Mass. 298
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 Mass. 298 (Griswold v. Plumb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griswold v. Plumb, 13 Mass. 298 (Mass. 1816).

Opinion

The Court said, there was nothing in the objection. If Sherrill had been present, there would have been no occasion to make a demand on both the defendants, their undertaking being joint.-

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Vailes
275 N.E.2d 893 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Morse v. Aldrich
42 Mass. 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)
Mowry v. Todd
12 Mass. 281 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Mass. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-plumb-mass-1816.