Griswold v. Newman

259 A.D. 1111, 21 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8164
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, have each recovered a judgment against the defendant for negligence. The ear in which they were riding [1112] belonged to the wife and was driven by the husband. The trial judge erroneously charged that the negligence of the driver was not imputable to the owner. (Gochee v. Wagner, 257 N. Y. 344.) The verdict of the jury indicated a finding of fact that the husband, the driver, was not negligent, thus rendering the error harmless. The evidence shows a clear case of negligence on the part of the defendant and the judgments and order should be affirmed. Judgments and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griswold v. Newman, 259 A.D. 1111, 21 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1111 (Griswold v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strittmatter v. Rappaport
74 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Young v. Hackett
49 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)