Griswold v. Lockhart

822 S.W.2d 388, 308 Ark. 265, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 567
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 3, 1992
Docket91-342
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 822 S.W.2d 388 (Griswold v. Lockhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griswold v. Lockhart, 822 S.W.2d 388, 308 Ark. 265, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 567 (Ark. 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks permission to file a handwritten brief which we will entertain upon a substantial showing of merit. Patterson v. State, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for habeas corpus based on allegations that appellant was charged by information rather than indictment and that he was never afforded a “first appearance” before being bound over to circuit court. However, these are not matters cognizable by habeas corpus and, accordingly, appellant has failed to make a substantial showing of merit. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McConaughy v. Lockhart
840 S.W.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 S.W.2d 388, 308 Ark. 265, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-lockhart-ark-1992.