Griswold v. Lockhart

822 S.W.2d 388, 308 Ark. 265, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 567
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 3, 1992·No. 91-342·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks permission to file a handwritten brief which we will entertain upon a substantial showing of merit. Patterson v. State, 289 Ark. 564, 712 S.W.2d 922 (1986). This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for habeas corpus based on allegations that appellant was charged by information rather than indictment and that he was never afforded a “first appearance” before being bound over to circuit court. However, these are not matters cognizable by habeas corpus and, accordingly, appellant has failed to make a substantial showing of merit. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griswold v. Lockhart, 822 S.W.2d 388, 308 Ark. 265, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 567 (Ark. 1992).

822 S.W.2d 388 (Griswold v. Lockhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McConaughy v. Lockhart
840 S.W.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)