Griswold v. Laverty
This text of 3 Duer 690 (Griswold v. Laverty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint was upon a promissory note, made by Coffee and Cutter, payable to the order of Daniel T. Youngs, and endorsed in blank by the latter, and also by the defendant.
On a demurrer to the complaint, the latter was held to be good, and the points above stated were decided at General Term. The case, with the opinion of the court, is reported in the N. Y. Leg. Ob. vol. 12, p. 316.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Duer 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-laverty-nysuperctnyc-1854.