Griswold v. Kurtz

80 A.D.2d 983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 1981·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order of Special Term denying in part its application for an order striking certain items in defendant hospital’s demand for bill of particulars. We agree that Items Nos. 16, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 35, 37, 40, 41 and 42 seek evidentiary material and should be stricken. In view of counsel’s concession at oral argument concerning the remaining items in the demand, we have no occasion to pass on them. (Appeal from order of Oswego Supreme Court — protective order.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griswold v. Kurtz, 80 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

80 A.D.2d 983 (Griswold v. Kurtz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KNAVEL, VICTORIA v. WEST SENECA CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Knavel v. West Seneca Central School District
149 A.D.3d 1614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Elston v. Canty
15 A.D.3d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)