Griswold v. Kurtz
This text of 80 A.D.2d 983 (Griswold v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order of Special Term denying in part its application for an order striking certain items in defendant hospital’s demand for bill of particulars. We agree that Items Nos. 16, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 35, 37, 40, 41 and 42 seek evidentiary material and should be stricken. In view of counsel’s concession at oral argument concerning the remaining items in the demand, we have no occasion to pass on them. (Appeal from order of Oswego Supreme Court — protective order.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.2d 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-kurtz-nyappdiv-1981.