Griswold v. Harry M. Stevens Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Griswold v. Harry M. Stevens Holding Corp.

183 A.D.2d 620, 584 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 620 (Griswold v. Harry M. Stevens Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griswold v. Harry M. Stevens Holding Corp., 183 A.D.2d 620, 584 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered February 7, 1991, which conditionally directed respondents to turn over certain corporate information to petitioner’s coun[621]*621sel, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of vacating the condition which directs petitioner to first make another offer to sell his shares to respondent corporation, of directing that respondents provide the information requested in petitioner’s letter to respondents’ attorney, William Bush, Esq., which letter is dated November 25, 1990, and of granting petitioner a 30 day extension, from his receipt of all of the corporate information as directed, to exercise his rights under the Shareholders’ Agreement to sell his shares free of restraint, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner has previously complied with the procedure provided for in the Shareholders’ Agreement which required him to offer his shares for sale to the corporation at a price to be arrived at by application of a specific formula. The corporation has rejected said offer and consequently petitioner is entitled to sell his shares in the open market, free of corporate restraints, for 30 days from his receipt of the corporate information. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered February 7, 1991, which conditionally directed respondents to turn over certain corporate information to petitioner’s coun[621]*621sel, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of vacating the condition which directs petitioner to first make another offer to sell his shares to respondent corporation, of directing that respondents provide the information requested in petitioner’s letter to respondents’ attorney, William Bush, Esq., which letter is dated November 25, 1990, and of granting petitioner a 30 day extension, from his receipt of all of the corporate information as directed, to exercise his rights under the Shareholders’ Agreement to sell his shares free of restraint, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner has previously complied with the procedure provided for in the Shareholders’ Agreement which required him to offer his shares for sale to the corporation at a price to be arrived at by application of a specific formula. The corporation has rejected said offer and consequently petitioner is entitled to sell his shares in the open market, free of corporate restraints, for 30 days from his receipt of the corporate information. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 620, 584 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griswold-v-harry-m-stevens-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1992.