Grissom v. State

259 So. 2d 738, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grissom v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 So. 2d 57
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1972·No. No. 71-760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Swindle v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So.2d 132; Suarez v. State, Fla. App.1969, 220 So.2d 442; Grissom v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 57; Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 23; Lopetegui v. State, Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 914 (opinion filed January 25, 1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grissom v. State, 259 So. 2d 738, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

259 So. 2d 738 (Grissom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swindle v. State
202 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Grissom v. State
237 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Lutheran Brotherhood v. Hooten
237 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Suarez v. State
220 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Lopetegui v. State
257 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)