Grissom v. State
This text of 2016 Ark. 28 (Grissom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. 28
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS. No. CR-15-727
WESLEY ELISHA GRISSOM Opinion Delivered January 28, 2016 APPELLANT APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS V. APPEAL AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN EVENT STATE OF ARKANSAS COURT DENIES MOTION TO DISMISS APPELLEE APPEAL [GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 26CR-06-611]
HONORABLE MARCIA R. HEARNSBERGER, JUDGE
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL GRANTED; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOOT.
PER CURIAM
On September 18, 2008, judgment was entered reflecting that appellant Wesley
Elisha Grissom had entered a plea of guilty to sexual assault in the first degree. He was
sentenced to 660 months’ imprisonment.
On July 15, 2015, Grissom filed in the trial court a pro se petition for postconviction
relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2008). On August 6, 2015,
the trial court determined that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of the
petition because it was not timely filed. On August 19, 2015, Grissom lodged an appeal in
this court from the order.
Now before us are the appellee State’s motion requesting that the appeal be dismissed
and the State’s motion requesting an extension of brief time if this court denies the motion Cite as 2016 Ark. 28
to dismiss the appeal. We grant the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal because, pursuant
to Rule 37.2(c)(i), Grissom’s petition was not timely filed. The motion for an extension of
brief time is moot.
When a petitioner seeking postconviction relief entered a plea of guilty, a petition
under Rule 37.1 must be filed within ninety days of the date that the judgment was entered-
of-record. Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c)(i). The petition that Grissom filed on July 15, 2015,
was filed almost seven years after the judgment in his case had been entered of record in
2008; accordingly, the trial court was correct to deny relief.
Motion to dismiss appeal granted; motion for extension of brief time moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissom-v-state-ark-2016.