Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Grissom v. State

Grissom v. State

761 S.W.2d 606, 297 Ark. 390, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 544
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 19, 1988
DocketRC 88-67
StatusPublished

This text of 761 S.W.2d 606 (Grissom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grissom v. State, 761 S.W.2d 606, 297 Ark. 390, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 544 (Ark. 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Bobby Ray Grissom, by his attorney, Ray Nickle, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
761 S.W.2d 606, 297 Ark. 390, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissom-v-state-ark-1988.