Grissom v. . Parish
This text of 62 N.C. 330 (Grissom v. . Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The devise to Elizabeth Hester for life remainder to such of her children as should be living at her death, did not vest any estate in the plaintiffs (her daughters) during her life, because it was uncertain whether they or either of them would survive her. Their interest was contingent, and was not, and could not have been, reduced into possession by their husbands in the life-time of their mother. Therefore, at the time when their husbands attempted to convey the lands to Parish, they had nothing to convey, and *332 their deed conveyed nothing. Arrington v. Yarbrough, 1 Jon. Eq., 72.
The plaintiffs have the right to elect to take the land instead of the proceeds of sale.
The demurrer must be overruled with costs.
Decree accordingly
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 N.C. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissom-v-parish-nc-1868.