Grissom v. Dahart Ice Cream Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Grissom v. Dahart Ice Cream Co.

40 So. 2d 339, 252 Ala. 235, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 394

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 17, 1949

Docket6 Div. 864.

StatusPublished

This text of 40 So. 2d 339 (Grissom v. Dahart Ice Cream Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grissom v. Dahart Ice Cream Co., 40 So. 2d 339, 252 Ala. 235, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 394 (Ala. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

We have carefully examined the application for the issuance of the writ of certiorari, in connection with the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and find no erroneoiis statements in the opinion as applied to the facts found by the Court of .Apipfeáls. We are, therefore, of the opinion that, the application for the writ of certiorari should be denied and the petition dismissed.

Writ denied; petition dismissed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, Justice.

We have carefully examined the application for the issuance of the writ of certiorari, in connection with the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and find no erroneoiis statements in the opinion as applied to the facts found by the Court of .Apipfeáls. We are, therefore, of the opinion that, the application for the writ of certiorari should be denied and the petition dismissed.

Writ denied; petition dismissed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 So. 2d 339, 252 Ala. 235, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissom-v-dahart-ice-cream-co-ala-1949.