Grissett v. State
This text of 536 So. 2d 46 (Grissett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Harold and Alice Grissett are partners in Andalusia Garden Center, a retail garden center and rental business. In October 1987, the Grissetts filed a complaint against the State of Alabama. The complaint alleged that the State, by modifying “vehicular routing and traffic flow at a point on Alabama Highway 55 and U.S. Highway 29,” had caused Andalusia Garden Center to become less accessible to its customers. The complaint further alleged that potential customers had a more difficult time understanding how to get to the garden center. The trial court dismissed the complaint. Rule 12(b)(6), A.R.Civ.P. This appeal followed.
The judgment is due to be affirmed on principles of law discussed in State v. Moore, 382 So.2d 543 (Ala.1980), and Pike County v. Whittington, 263 Ala. 47, 81 So.2d 288 (1955).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
536 So. 2d 46, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 598, 1988 WL 130777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissett-v-state-ala-1988.