Grissel A. Gonzaga v. James Dzurenda, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 22, 2026·No. 2:25-cv-00174·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

GRISSEL A. GONZAGA, Case No. 2:25-cv-00174-APG-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order JAMES DZURENDA, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 It appears that Plaintiff was discharged from FMWCC without updating the mailing 12 address on the docket. See Docket Nos. 19-23 (“Offender discharged from FMWCC”). “A party, 13] not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing 14] address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 15] 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with 16] the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so 17] may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 18 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by August 19] 5, 2026. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 21 Dated: July 22, 2026

Nancy J. Koppe* 23 United States Magistrate Judge

25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grissel A. Gonzaga v. James Dzurenda, et al., (D. Nev. 2026).

Grissel A. Gonzaga v. James Dzurenda, et al. (Grissel A. Gonzaga v. James Dzurenda, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory Carey v. John E. King
856 F.2d 1439 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Richard M. Penta
940 F.2d 13 (First Circuit, 1991)