Griss v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

554 So. 2d 556, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2793, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6820, 1989 WL 146012

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive question is whether the use of deadly force in self-defense constitutes intentional conduct causing harm to another within the exclusion-from-coverage provision of a homeowner’s insurance policy. On the authority of Marshall v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 534 So.2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), rev. granted,,1 544 So.2d 201 (Fla.1989), we answer the question in the negative, and certify the question.

Reversed and remanded.

Footnotes

1

. Marshall conflicts with Clemmons v. American States Ins. Co., 412 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).