Grismore v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 95-40938·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40938 Summary Calendar

BENNIE GRISMORE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:93-CV-496 _________________________________________________________________ June 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bennie Grismore appeals, pro se, the dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He contends that his rights were violated

by the failure to apply retroactively new Texas state law requiring

a definition of reasonable doubt in the jury charge. He contends

also that his due process rights were violated by the trial court’s

admission of evidence of an extraneous offense. We affirm for

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. Grismore v.

Collins, No. 6:93-CV-496 (E.D. Tex. October 26, 1995). We do not

address Grismore's ineffective assistance of counsel contentions,

raised for the first time on appeal.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grismore v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 1996).

Grismore v. Johnson (Grismore v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related