Grismore v. Johnson
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-40938 Summary Calendar
BENNIE GRISMORE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,
Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:93-CV-496 _________________________________________________________________ June 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bennie Grismore appeals, pro se, the dismissal of his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He contends that his rights were violated
by the failure to apply retroactively new Texas state law requiring
a definition of reasonable doubt in the jury charge. He contends
also that his due process rights were violated by the trial court’s
admission of evidence of an extraneous offense. We affirm for
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. Grismore v.
Collins, No. 6:93-CV-496 (E.D. Tex. October 26, 1995). We do not
address Grismore's ineffective assistance of counsel contentions,
raised for the first time on appeal.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grismore v. Johnson (Grismore v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.