Grisham v. State
82 So. 643, 17 Ala. App. 153, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 165
Opinion
There are but two exceptions reserved to the rulings of the court on the trial of this case. Both of these relate to the admission of evidence. We have examined them both, and find that the court did not err in either instance. No brief is filed in support of these exceptions, and in accordance with the rule laid down in Simmons v. State, supra, 82 South. 643, no opinion will be written.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grisham v. State, 82 So. 643, 17 Ala. App. 153, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 165 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).
82 So. 643 (Grisham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dowdy v. State
136 So. 926 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)