Grisham v. Edwards

86 So. 3d 993, 2011 WL 6274138, 2011 Ala. LEXIS 208
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 16, 2011
Docket1101316
StatusPublished

This text of 86 So. 3d 993 (Grisham v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grisham v. Edwards, 86 So. 3d 993, 2011 WL 6274138, 2011 Ala. LEXIS 208 (Ala. 2011).

Opinion

WISE, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). See also Rule 39(a)(1)(D), Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

MALONE, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, SHAW, and MAIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 3d 993, 2011 WL 6274138, 2011 Ala. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grisham-v-edwards-ala-2011.