Griselda Guadalupe Bautista Gutierrez v. Karla Torres Rueda Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Benito Rodriguez, and as Next Friend of Dafne Lisette Rodriguez, Minor

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2008
Docket13-08-00116-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Griselda Guadalupe Bautista Gutierrez v. Karla Torres Rueda Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Benito Rodriguez, and as Next Friend of Dafne Lisette Rodriguez, Minor (Griselda Guadalupe Bautista Gutierrez v. Karla Torres Rueda Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Benito Rodriguez, and as Next Friend of Dafne Lisette Rodriguez, Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griselda Guadalupe Bautista Gutierrez v. Karla Torres Rueda Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Benito Rodriguez, and as Next Friend of Dafne Lisette Rodriguez, Minor, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00029-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL AND SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relators, Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc.

d/b/a Mont Meta Memorial Park, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus by which they

request this Court to direct respondent, the Honorable Abel Limas, presiding judge of the

404th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, to vacate the trial court’s order for

1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) ("W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinion but is not required to do so."); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). a new trial and enter a final judgment that denies injunctive relief. This Court requested

a response and one was filed.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the

relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See TEX . R. APP. P.

52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

Per Curiam

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed on the 3rd day of March, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Griselda Guadalupe Bautista Gutierrez v. Karla Torres Rueda Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel Benito Rodriguez, and as Next Friend of Dafne Lisette Rodriguez, Minor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griselda-guadalupe-bautista-gutierrez-v-karla-torres-rueda-rodriguez-texapp-2008.