Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 2026

Docket4D2026-0240

StatusPublished

This text of Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta (Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER, Appellant,

v.

JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA, Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0240

[February 25, 2026]

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Annette Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502020DR003221XXXXMB.

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander, Marysville, Washington, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the order temporarily modifying timesharing. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion. Riddle v. Riddle, 214 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Temporary relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances.”).

Affirmed.

KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI