Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2026·No. 4D2026-0240·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER, Appellant,

v.

JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0240

[February 25, 2026]

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Annette Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502020DR003221XXXXMB.

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander, Marysville, Washington, pro se.

No appearance for appellee. PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the order temporarily modifying timesharing.

Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion. Riddle v. Riddle, 214 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Temporary relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances.”).

Affirmed. KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta (Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riddle v. Riddle
214 So. 3d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)