Grise v. Dunn

149 A. 213, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 186

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal, so far as argued, relies upon the claim that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not justify its conclusion that, "The plaintiff was in the exercise of due care at the time of the accident.” As we read the finding we are of the opinion that this appeal is wholly without merit.

There is no error.