Grise v. Dunn
149 A. 213, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 186
This text of 149 A. 213 (Grise v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grise v. Dunn, 149 A. 213, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 186 (Colo. 1930).
Opinion
The appeal, so far as argued, relies upon the claim that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not justify its conclusion that, "The plaintiff was in the exercise of due care at the time of the accident.” As we read the finding we are of the opinion that this appeal is wholly without merit.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
149 A. 213, 111 Conn. 719, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grise-v-dunn-conn-1930.