Griscom v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Griscom v. Gilmore

15 N.J.L. 475

DecidedNovember 15, 1836

StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.J.L. 475 (Griscom v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griscom v. Gilmore, 15 N.J.L. 475 (N.J. 1836).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

Let a rule for an allocatur, be entered. It is sufficiently uncertain upon the face of this return, to justify the allowance of a certiorari.

JEakin, then inquired how the writ should be entitled; as some diversity of opinion and practice had prevailed in that matter.

[476]*476By the Court. Let the writ be entitled as between the applicant therefor, plaintiff in certiorari, and the applicant for the road, as defendant. It is a matter in which the public have no such interest, as to justify the use of the name of the State.

Certiorari allowed.

Cited in State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 414.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

Let a rule for an allocatur, be entered. It is sufficiently uncertain upon the face of this return, to justify the allowance of a certiorari.

JEakin, then inquired how the writ should be entitled; as some diversity of opinion and practice had prevailed in that matter.

[476]*476By the Court. Let the writ be entitled as between the applicant therefor, plaintiff in certiorari, and the applicant for the road, as defendant. It is a matter in which the public have no such interest, as to justify the use of the name of the State.

Certiorari allowed.

Cited in State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 414.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 N.J.L. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griscom-v-gilmore-nj-1836.