Griscom v. Gilmore

15 N.J.L. 475
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1836·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

Let a rule for an allocatur, be entered. It is sufficiently uncertain upon the face of this return, to justify the allowance of a certiorari.

JEakin, then inquired how the writ should be entitled; as some diversity of opinion and practice had prevailed in that matter.

[476]*476By the Court. Let the writ be entitled as between the applicant therefor, plaintiff in certiorari, and the applicant for the road, as defendant. It is a matter in which the public have no such interest, as to justify the use of the name of the State.

Certiorari allowed.

Cited in State v. Justice, 4 Zab. 414.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griscom v. Gilmore, 15 N.J.L. 475 (N.J. 1836).

15 N.J.L. 475 (Griscom v. Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.