Gripping v. Thurman
2 How. Pr. 275
This text of 2 How. Pr. 275 (Gripping v. Thurman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gripping v. Thurman, 2 How. Pr. 275 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
Opinion
Plaintiff ’s counsel insisted that the affidavit was insufficient ; it should have stated the cause of action ; it might be that the action was replevin, in which case defendant could not move for judgment as in case of nonsuit.
Held; the affidavit was sufficient, ' and there being no excuse shown, the motion was granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gripping-v-thurman-nysupct-1846.