Home/New York Court of Appeals/GRINKORN v. Seeley

GRINKORN v. Seeley

860 N.E.2d 988, 7 N.Y.3d 920, 827 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3909
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 21, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 860 N.E.2d 988 (GRINKORN v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GRINKORN v. Seeley, 860 N.E.2d 988, 7 N.Y.3d 920, 827 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3909 (N.Y. 2006).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Joseph Seeley, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Michael Williams, dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 N.E.2d 988, 7 N.Y.3d 920, 827 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grinkorn-v-seeley-ny-2006.