GRINKORN v. Seeley
860 N.E.2d 988, 7 N.Y.3d 920, 827 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3909
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Joseph Seeley, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Michael Williams, dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GRINKORN v. Seeley, 860 N.E.2d 988, 7 N.Y.3d 920, 827 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3909 (N.Y. 2006).
860 N.E.2d 988 (GRINKORN v. Seeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)