Griner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Griner v. State

685 So. 2d 99, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3825

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 685 So. 2d 99 (Griner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Griner v. State, 685 So. 2d 99, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Griner v. State, 662 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reversed appellant’s convictions for attempted first degree murder, robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft auto and remanded for a new trial. However, we affirmed his convictions for burglary with assault and robbery as those convictions arose from a separate trial which was not tainted by the erroneous admission of evidence.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief on the ground that the convictions had been reversed. We reverse, since appellant’s convictions and sentences from the first trial were affirmed. On remand the trial court should consider the [100]*100merits of the motion for post-conviction relief arising from the convictions we affirmed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In Griner v. State, 662 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reversed appellant’s convictions for attempted first degree murder, robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft auto and remanded for a new trial. However, we affirmed his convictions for burglary with assault and robbery as those convictions arose from a separate trial which was not tainted by the erroneous admission of evidence.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion for postconviction relief on the ground that the convictions had been reversed. We reverse, since appellant’s convictions and sentences from the first trial were affirmed. On remand the trial court should consider the [100]*100merits of the motion for post-conviction relief arising from the convictions we affirmed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 99, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griner-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack