Grindlinger v. Marpe, Inc.

56 A.D.2d 835, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11157

This text of 56 A.D.2d 835 (Grindlinger v. Marpe, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grindlinger v. Marpe, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 835, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In an action on certain promissory notes, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 21, 1976, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds that (1) the claims asserted are barred by the Statute of Limitations and (2) the complaint fails to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The complaint states a good cause of action and the Statute of Limitations is not a bar. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 835, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grindlinger-v-marpe-inc-nyappdiv-1977.