Grindling v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grindling v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 445 P.3d 25
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 2018·No. SCWC-16-0000474·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 15-AUG-2018 08:58 AM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

CHRIS GRINDLING, Respondent/Petitioner-Appellee,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAII, Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0007(3); CR. NO. 07-1-0533(2))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed July 2, 2018, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 15, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grindling v. State, (haw 2018).

Grindling v. State (Grindling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.