Grindling v. Raffetto
This text of Grindling v. Raffetto (Grindling v. Raffetto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000017 25-JAN-2012 02:00 PM
NO. SCPW-12-0000017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
CHRIS GRINDLING, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE SHACKLEY F. RAFFETTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(S.P.P. NO. 10-1-0011)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Grindling's
petition for a writ of mandamus filed on January 9, 2012 and the
record of S.P.P. No. 10-1-0011,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without
payment of the filing fee.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall serve the petition for a writ of mandamus on: (1) the
respondent judge; (2) the attorney general; and (3) the
prosecuting attorney for the County of Maui.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the respondent judge shall
file an answer to the petition for a writ of mandamus within
twenty days from the date of this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 25, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grindling v. Raffetto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grindling-v-raffetto-haw-2012.