Grindle v. Port Jervis Central School District

118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54681
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 830 (Grindle v. Port Jervis Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grindle v. Port Jervis Central School District, 118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Nastasi, J.), dated September 11, 1984, as granted the defendants’ cross motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff allegedly as a result of the defendants’ failure to examine her for scoliosis as is required by Education Law § 905. Education Law § 911 provides that the Commissioner of Education shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with the examination requirements of Education Law § 905, and may withhold funds from a school district which refuses or neglects to comply with the statutory requirements. Reading the two statues in pari materia, we find that the Legislature did not intend to create a private cause of action based upon a school district’s failure to examine students for scoliosis. Therefore, Special Term did not err when it dismissed the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Voluntown Board of Education, No. 547823 (Oct. 25, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14253 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Uhr v. East Greenbush Central School District
720 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Uhr v. East Greenbush Central School District
246 A.D.2d 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Bello v. Board of Education of Frankfort-Schuyler Central School District
139 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.2d 830, 500 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grindle-v-port-jervis-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1986.