Grinage v. State
This text of 275 S.W. 1116 (Grinage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the district court of Guadalupe county for the offense of murder and' his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of seven years.
The record is before us without brief or bills of exception. There is nothing presented for our review except the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
We have carefully considered the testimony as found in the Statements of Facts and conclude that the evidence is amply sufficient ; in fact it is our .judgment that the evidence would' have warranted a much severer penalty than the jury saw fit to assess in the case.
Finding no error in the record, it is our opinion that the judgment should be in all things affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved' by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 S.W. 1116, 101 Tex. Crim. 410, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grinage-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.