Grin v. 345 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.

212 A.D.2d 504, 622 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1090
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 504 (Grin v. 345 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grin v. 345 East 56th Street Owners, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 504, 622 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and for specific performance thereof, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 15, 1993, which, upon the motion and cross motion of the respective parties for summary judgment, granted summary judgment to the defendant and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The instant case arises out of a public auction held by the defendant, a cooperative housing corporation, to sell the shares of 50 cooperative apartment units owned by the sponsor to satisfy the sponsor’s debt to the defendant. The plaintiff submitted the second highest bid at the auction. When the highest bidder could not comply with the terms of the sale, the defendant offered the property to the plaintiff on the condition that he provide it with a $7,100 check (representing 10% of the purchase price as called for by the terms of sale) by the close of business the next day. This condition was not met and his bid was rejected. Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiff has standing to challenge the results of the auction, his complaint must be dismissed since he indisputably failed to comply with that condition. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joemark Enterprises, LLC v. City of Newburgh
62 A.D.3d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Daniel Perla Associates v. Krasdale Foods, Inc.
12 A.D.3d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Kaplan
273 A.D.2d 267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Navilia v. Windsor Wolf Road Properties Co.
249 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 504, 622 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grin-v-345-east-56th-street-owners-inc-nyappdiv-1995.