Grimsley v. State

993 So. 2d 1011, 2008 WL 80337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimsley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 So. 2d 123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2008·No. 2D07-2012·Published

Opinion

993 So.2d 1011 (2008)

Michael GRIMSLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D07-2012.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 9, 2008.

*1012 DAVIS, Judge.

Michael Grimsley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. During the pendency of this appeal, Grimsley filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (PAIAAC) pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). On review of the PAIAAC, this court recently reversed Grimsley's conviction, vacated his sentence, and directed that he be retried. See Grimsley v. State, 967 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Therefore, this appeal from the denial of Grimsley's rule 3.850 motion is rendered moot and is hereby dismissed.

Dismissed.

STRINGER and CANADY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimsley v. State, 993 So. 2d 1011, 2008 WL 80337 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

993 So. 2d 1011 (Grimsley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimsley v. State
967 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)