Grimsley v. State
This text of 993 So. 2d 1011 (Grimsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael GRIMSLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*1012 DAVIS, Judge.
Michael Grimsley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. During the pendency of this appeal, Grimsley filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (PAIAAC) pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). On review of the PAIAAC, this court recently reversed Grimsley's conviction, vacated his sentence, and directed that he be retried. See Grimsley v. State, 967 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Therefore, this appeal from the denial of Grimsley's rule 3.850 motion is rendered moot and is hereby dismissed.
Dismissed.
STRINGER and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 So. 2d 1011, 2008 WL 80337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimsley-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.