Grimsley v. State

453 So. 2d 466, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 18540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimsley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 So. 2d 1075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1984·No. No. 83-2217·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to Point I, see Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120, 1123 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed. 652 (1982); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. [467]*467307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed. 560 (1979). As to Point II, see Treverrow v. State, 194 So.2d 250, 252 (Fla.1967); Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873, 879 (Fla.2d DCA 1965). As to Point III, see Brown v. State, 229 So.2d 898, 899 (Fla.2d DCA 1969).

RYDER, C.J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimsley v. State, 453 So. 2d 466, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 18540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 466 (Grimsley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Tibbs v. Florida
457 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Spataro v. State
179 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Brown v. State
229 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)