Grimsley v. State

140 So. 327, 104 Fla. 519
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 327 (Grimsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimsley v. State, 140 So. 327, 104 Fla. 519 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—-Plaintiff in Error was indicted, tried and convicted in the Circuit Court of Okaloosa County for buying and receiving stolen property. The sole basis for writ of error is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction. We have examined the evidence carefully and we think it fails to sufficiently connect the plaintiff in error with the charge brought against him. In this state of the record, *520 under repeated decisions of this court, the ends of justice would require a new trial. The judgment below is accordingly reversed and a new trial awarded.

Reversed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 327, 104 Fla. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimsley-v-state-fla-1932.