Grimsley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Grimsley v. State

645 So. 2d 370, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 268, 1994 WL 321864

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 8, 1994

DocketCR 93-1037

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 So. 2d 370 (Grimsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimsley v. State, 645 So. 2d 370, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 268, 1994 WL 321864 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant, Thomas Grimsley, an inmate of the Alabama prison system, challenges the denial of “retroactive good time.”

The appellant was convicted of rape in the second degree on August 10, 1990, and was sentenced to 10 year's’ imprisonment. He contends that his denial of good time is based on Ala.Code 1975, § 14 — 9—41(h), which denies good time to sex offenders.

In Brooks v. State, 622 So.2d 447, 451 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), this Court held that “the sex offender exception to § 14-9-41(h) (Supp.1992) is without rational basis and therefore a violation of equal protection principles.”

The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that the circuit court reconsider the petition in light of the principles announced in Brooks.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI