Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Supreme Court of Florida

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

203 So. 2d 166, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3432

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1967

DocketNo. 36526

StatusPublished

This text of 203 So. 2d 166 (Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home, 203 So. 2d 166, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3432 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there [167]*167has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys’ fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI