Grimsley v. Black
54 Pa. Super. 413, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 77
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 16, 1913
DocketAppeals, Nos. 175, 176, 177 and 178
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 54 Pa. Super. 413 (Grimsley v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grimsley v. Black, 54 Pa. Super. 413, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 77 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
Notwithstanding the earnest and able argument of appellant’s counsel, we are of opinion that all the questions involved in these appeals are correctly and adequately answered in the opinion of the learned trial judge overruling the motion for a new trial.
The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment in each of the above-mentioned cases is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dinsel v. Pennsylvania Railroad
144 F. Supp. 883 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
Beishline v. Tatterfield
22 Pa. D. & C. 701 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Furer v. May, Jr.
174 A. 630 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 Pa. Super. 413, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimsley-v-black-pasuperct-1913.