Grimsley v. Black
54 Pa. Super. 413, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 77
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 16, 1913·No. Appeals, Nos. 175, 176, 177 and 178·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Notwithstanding the earnest and able argument of appellant’s counsel, we are of opinion that all the questions involved in these appeals are correctly and adequately answered in the opinion of the learned trial judge overruling the motion for a new trial.
The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment in each of the above-mentioned cases is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimsley v. Black, 54 Pa. Super. 413, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 77 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).
54 Pa. Super. 413 (Grimsley v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dinsel v. Pennsylvania Railroad
144 F. Supp. 883 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)
Beishline v. Tatterfield
22 Pa. D. & C. 701 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Furer v. May, Jr.
174 A. 630 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)