Grimmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Grimmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad

34 A. 210, 175 Pa. 1, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1195

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 6, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 329

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A. 210 (Grimmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimmer v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 34 A. 210, 175 Pa. 1, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1195 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful examination of the testimony, in the light of the clear and able argument of appellant’s counsel, has failed to disclose anything that would have justified the learned trial judge in submitting to the jury the question of defendant company’s negligence as the proximate cause of plaintiff’s unfortunate injury. We are all of opinion that there was no error in refusing to take off the judgment of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

A careful examination of the testimony, in the light of the clear and able argument of appellant’s counsel, has failed to disclose anything that would have justified the learned trial judge in submitting to the jury the question of defendant company’s negligence as the proximate cause of plaintiff’s unfortunate injury. We are all of opinion that there was no error in refusing to take off the judgment of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 210, 175 Pa. 1, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimmer-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pa-1896.