Grimes v. Ward
This text of 1937 OK 2 (Grimes v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order confirming sheriff’s sale entered March 9, 1936. The appeal was filed September 29, 1936. A motion for new trial was filed after the order of confirmation was entered and thereafter overruled. The motion to dismiss is upon the ground that the motion for new trial was unnecessary and therefore served no purpose to extend the time in which the case could be filed in this court. The appeal must be dismissed.
This court has many times held that the filing and determination of a motion for new trial on a contested question of fact arising upon a motion and not upon the pleadings is unnecessary and serves no purpose to extend the time in which to file an appeal. Powell v. Nichols, 26 Okla. 734, 110 P. 762; Williamson v. Adams, 31 Okla. 503, 122 P. 499; Wilkinson v. Thomas, 175 Okla. 351, 52 P. (2d) 726; United Mining & Milling Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 167 Okla. 638, 31 P. (2d) 550; Lambert v. Monarch Cement Co., 141 Okla. 31, 285 P. 844; Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co., 177 Okla. 313, 58 P. (2d) 863.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1937 OK 2, 64 P.2d 894, 179 Okla. 5, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-ward-okla-1937.