Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Grimes v. State

Grimes v. State

797 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2001 WL 1245056
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grimes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2288 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2001·No. No. 5D00-3383·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, J.

Although we agree with appellant that the complained-of evidentiary ruling concerning Mr. Jowers’ proffered testimony was erroneous, in light of all the other [639]*639evidence in this case, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimes v. State, 797 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2001 WL 1245056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

797 So. 2d 638 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.