Grimes v. State
321 So. 2d 584, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1975·No. No. 74-863·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
The appealed judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial with directions that the defendant be permitted to elicit the name and address of the informant witness should the state choose to call him to the stand. This is done by authority of Hassberger v. State, 321 So.2d 577 (Fla.App. 4th 1975).
Grimes and Hassberger were codefend-ants convicted at the same time and under the same circumstances with reference to the confidential informant.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. State, 321 So. 2d 584, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
321 So. 2d 584 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kearns-Tribune Corp. v. Wilkinson
946 P.2d 372 (Utah Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Hassberger
350 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)