Grimes v. State

321 So. 2d 584, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1975
DocketNo. 74-863
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 321 So. 2d 584 (Grimes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grimes v. State, 321 So. 2d 584, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appealed judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial with directions that the defendant be permitted to elicit the name and address of the informant witness should the state choose to call him to the stand. This is done by authority of Hassberger v. State, 321 So.2d 577 (Fla.App. 4th 1975).

Grimes and Hassberger were codefend-ants convicted at the same time and under the same circumstances with reference to the confidential informant.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., and BOOHER, STEPHEN R., Associate Judge, concur. MAGER, J., dissents, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kearns-Tribune Corp. v. Wilkinson
946 P.2d 372 (Utah Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Hassberger
350 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 So. 2d 584, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.