Grimes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grimes v. State

291 So. 2d 643, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1154

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 So. 2d 643 (Grimes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grimes v. State, 291 So. 2d 643, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complained of portion of the Prosecutor’s closing argument, viewed in light of the whole argument and the Court’s instructions, were not of sufficient harm and moment as to dictate a reversal of the defendant’s judgment of conviction of a crime. James v. State, 263 So.2d 284 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1972); Wingate v. State, 232 So.2d 44 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1970); and Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443, 191 So. 847 (1939).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The complained of portion of the Prosecutor’s closing argument, viewed in light of the whole argument and the Court’s instructions, were not of sufficient harm and moment as to dictate a reversal of the defendant’s judgment of conviction of a crime. James v. State, 263 So.2d 284 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1972); Wingate v. State, 232 So.2d 44 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1970); and Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443, 191 So. 847 (1939).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 So. 2d 643, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grimes-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack