Grimes v. State
291 So. 2d 643, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 1974·No. No. 73-1154·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The complained of portion of the Prosecutor’s closing argument, viewed in light of the whole argument and the Court’s instructions, were not of sufficient harm and moment as to dictate a reversal of the defendant’s judgment of conviction of a crime. James v. State, 263 So.2d 284 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1972); Wingate v. State, 232 So.2d 44 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1970); and Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443, 191 So. 847 (1939).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grimes v. State, 291 So. 2d 643, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
291 So. 2d 643 (Grimes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Volk
291 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)